Apple-shaped obesity; a risky soil for cytokine-accelerated severity in COVID-19 (preprint)

Obesity is one of the most significant risk factors for the deterioration and mortality associated with COVID-19 [1]. A certain proportion of COVID-19 patients experience marked elevations of inflammatory mediators, termed “cytokine storm”, resulting in the deterioration of the respiratory condition [2,3]. In the present study, we elucidate that the high visceral adipose tissue (VAT) burden was more closely related to accelerated inflammatory responses and the mortality of Japanese COVID-19 patients than other obesity-associated markers, including body mass index (BMI). To explore a novel stratification of COVID-19 patients, we infected mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 in several obese mice, revealing that VAT-dominant ob/ob mice and diet-induced obesity obese mice died after infection with low-titer mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 virus due to the subsequent cytokine storm, whereas none of the subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) dominant db/db mice or control lean wild-type mice died. SARS-CoV-2 genome and proteins were more abundant in the lungs of ob/ob mice, engulfed in macrophages, resulting in increased production of inflammatory cytokine represented by IL-6. As well as the anti-IL-6 treatment, the prevention of obesity by leptin administration improved the survival of SARS-CoV-2 infected ob/ob mice by reducing the viral protein burden and excessive immune responses.

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in healthcare workers at a frontline hospital in Tokyo (preprint)

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are highly exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The aim of this study was to assess the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in HCWs working in a frontline hospital in Tokyo, Japan. In this observational cohort study, screening was offered to agreed HCWs, including medical, nursing, and others, as part of a mandatory health checkup. The screening test results and clinical characteristics of the participants were recorded. The antibody seroprevalence among the 4,147 participants screened from July 6 to August 21 2020, was 0.34 % (14/4,147). There was no significant difference in seroprevalence between frontline HCWs with a high exposure risk and HCWs in other settings with a low exposure risk. Of those seropositive for SARS-CoV-2, 64% (9/14) were not aware of any symptoms and had not previously been diagnosed with COVID-19. In conclusion, this study provides insights into the extent of infection and immune status in HCWs in Japan, which has a relatively low prevalence of COVID-19.

Worries and concerns among healthcare workers during the coronavirus 2019 pandemic: a web-based cross-sectional survey (preprint)

BackgroundHealthcare workers (HCWs) treating and caring for patients with emerging infectious diseases often experience psychological distress. However, the psychological impact and behavior change of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic among HCWs are still unknown. This study aimed to investigate the worries and concerns of HCWs regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsIn this cross-sectional survey, a web-based questionnaire was distributed among HCWs working in hospitals or clinics across Japanese medical facilities from April 20 to May 1, 2020. The questionnaire comprised items on demographics, worries and concerns, perceptions regarding the sufficiency of information, and behavioral changes pertaining to the COVID-19 pandemic. ResultsA total of 4386 HCWs completed the survey; 1648 (64.7%) were aged 30-39 years, 2379 (54.2%) were male, and 782 (18.1%) were frontline HCWs, directly caring for patients with COVID-19 on a daily basis. 3500 HCWs (79.8%) indicated that they were seriously worried about the pandemic. The most frequent concern was the consequence of becoming infected on their family, work, and society (87.4%). Additionally, the majority (55.5%) had restricted social contact and almost all HCWs endorsed a shortage in personal protective equipment (median, 8/9 (interquartile range; 7-9) on a Likert scale). There was no significant difference in the degree of worry between frontline and non-frontline HCWs (8/9 (7-9) vs. 8/9 (7-9), p=0.25). Frontline HCWs, compared to non-frontline HCWs, were more likely to have the need to avoid contact with families and friends (24.8% vs. 17.8%, p<0.001) and indicated that they cannot evade their professional duty during the COVID-19 pandemic (9/9 (7-9) vs. 8/9 (6-9), p<0.001). Further, the extremely low proportion of frontline HCWs reported that they would take a leave of absence to avoid infection (1.2%). ConclusionsBoth frontline and non-frontline HCWs expressed comparable concerns regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. Because HCWs, especially frontline HCWs, reported that they cannot be obliged to do avoid their duty, effective mental health protection strategies should be developed and implemented for HCWs.